🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Ideology

For example, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for using too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.